The Thing (1982)
USA; 109min
Horror, Mystery, Sci-Fi, Thriller
Director: John Carpenter
Writer: Bill Lancaster, John W. Campbell Jr. (novel)
Stars: Kurt Russell, Wilford Brimley, Keith David

The Thing is real classic from king of atmosphere, John Carpenter, and one of the most famous horrors which is, nowadays, a lot more easier to classify as a psychological thriller than a horror movie.  
The film is based on a novel by John W. Campbell, Jr., Who Goes There? and is often mentioned as a remake of The Thing from Another World from 1951. It is also a part of the Apocalypse trilogy which also includes  Prince of Darkness (1987) and In the Mouth of Madness (1994). 

The film begins with a scene of Norwegian scientist chasing a dog in Antarctica. The hunt ends at the U.S. scientific station where Americans, of course, shot fissured Norwegian and saved the dog. They weren't concerned about why someone so badly wanted to kill the dog so they let him stay in the station. Soon we learn the reason of Norwegian pursuit. 
Norwegian scientists have found unknown being frozen in the ice and being convinced that it's dead they unfrozed it. The thing was alive and just like every other life-form it wanted to survive. Only ability the thing had is to imitate any life-form with which it makes contact. In imitating process original life-form dies. And that is the core of the story. Who's real and who's not?
As a psychological thriller film works wonderfully. Horror elements fits perfectly and the atmosphere is brilliantly polished with scenery and music and special effects are pretty impressive for 80's. Many scenes in the film are still striking and recognizable. That's what makes the film special, but pretty much everything else falls under mediocrity.

The cast led by Kurt Russell did a solid job, and for many people Russell is most recognizable as MacReady. Here we come to the big problem of characterization. It is not strange for Carpenter that the main characters are superficial and purpose of many of them is only to die. Almost every his story is successful despite this, but that does not diminish the fact that this is still a big problem because the easiest way for audience to connect with film is through the characters. Also, some characters must behave totally illogical for story to be successful, what especially in the modern era,  is very annoying. 
But in total The Thing deserves a high mark. Especially because of the brilliant atmosphere and interest that it creates.

Aposultni klasik kralja atmosfere Johna Carpentera, te jedan od najpoznatijih horrora kojega je, pogotovo danas, ipak puno lakše klasificirati kao psihološki triler nego horror. Film je snimljen prema romanu Johna W. Campbella, Jr. Who Goes There? te se često navodi kao remake filma The Thing from Another World iz 1951. godine. Također film funkcionira kao dio, samo tematski povezane, Apocalypse trilogije u koju još spadaju Prince of Darkness (1987) i In the Mouth of Madness (1994).

Film započinje scenom lova norveškog znanstvenika na Antartici za psom. Taj lov završi u Američkoj znanstvenoj postaji gdje amerikanci, naravno, raspucanog norvežana zauvijek umire, a psa spase. Ni u jednom trenutku se ne upitavši zašto je netko toliko žarko htio ubiti tog psa, primaju ga u stanicu, a mi uskoro saznajemo razlog Norvežaninove potjere.

Norveški znanstvenici su u ledu proanšli zaleđeno nepoznato biće i uvjereni da je mrtvo ga odledili. Biće kao i svako drugo želi preživjeti, a jedina sposobnost koju ima je preuzimanje oblika bilo kojeg drugog bića pri čemu ubije originalno biće. I tu je srž priče. Tko je stvaran, a tko nije.

Kao psihološki triler film funkcionira izvrsno. Elemtni horrora se savršno uklapaju, te je atmosfera fenomenalno dotjerana scenografijom i glazbom, a i specijalni efekti su za to doba relativno impresivni. Mnoge scene iz filma su i danas upečatljive i prepoznatljive. To je ono po čemu je film poseban, ali sve ostalo više manje spada pod mediokritet.

Glumačka postava na čelu sa  Kurt Russelom je posao odradila solidno, te je Russel mnogima najprepoznatljivi baš kao R.J. MacReady. Tu dolazimo do problema karakterizacije likova. Nije čudno za Carpentera da su mu glavni likovi površni, a sporedni čestu tu samo da umru i gotovo svaka priča mu uspješno stoji unatoč tome, ali to ne umanjuje činjenicu da je to ipak poveći nedostatak jer publika se najlakše povezuje sa filmom upravo preko likova. Također, neki likovi se ponašaju apsorudno nelogično u svrhu uspijeha priče, što je, posebno u suvremeno doba, veoma iritantna pojava.

No The Thing ukupno zaslužuje visoku ocijenu. Posebno zbog fenomenalne atmosfere i interesa koji stvara kod većine gledatelja.